Search for: All records

Nanomaterials acquire a biomolecular corona upon introduction to biological media, leading to biological transformations such as changes in protein function, unmasking of epitopes, and protein fibrilization. Ex vivo studies to investigate the effect of nanoparticles on protein–protein interactions are typically performed in buffer and are rarely measured quantitatively in live cells. Here, we measure the differential effect of silica nanoparticles on protein association in vitro vs. in mammalian cells. BtubA and BtubB are a pair of bacterial tubulin proteins identified inProsthecobacterstrains that self-assemble like eukaryotic tubulin, first into dimers and then into microtubules in vitro or in vivo. Förster resonance energy transfer labeling of each of the Btub monomers with a donor (mEGFP) and acceptor (mRuby3) fluorescent protein provides a quantitative tool to measure their binding interactions in the presence of unfunctionalized silica nanoparticles in buffer and in cells using fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy. We show that silica nanoparticles enhance BtubAB dimerization in buffer due to protein corona formation. However, these nanoparticles have little effect on bacterial tubulin self-assembly in the complex mammalian cellular environment. Thus, the effect of nanomaterials on protein–protein interactions may not be readily translated from the test tube to the cell in the absence of particle surface functionalization that can enable targeted protein–nanoparticle interactions to withstand competitive binding in the nanoparticle corona from other biomolecules. 

Studies of proteins from one organism in another organism’s cells have shown that such exogenous proteins stick more, pointing toward coevolution of the cytoplasm and protein surface to minimize stickiness. Here we flip this question around by asking whether exogenous proteins can assemble efficiently into their target complexes in a non-native cytoplasm. We use as our model system the assembly of BtubA and BtubB from Prosthecobacter hosted in human U-2 OS cells. BtubA and B evolved from eukaryotic tubulins after horizontal gene transfer, but they have low surface sequence identity with the homologous human tubulins and do not respond to tubulin drugs such as nocodazole. In U-2 OS cells, BtubA and B assemble efficiently into dimers compared to in vitro, and the wild-type BtubA and B proteins subsequently are able to form microtubules as well. We find that generic crowding effects (Ficoll 70 in vitro) contribute significantly to efficient dimer assembly when compared to sticking interactions (U-2 OS cell lysate in vitro), consistent with the notion that a generic mechanism such as crowding can be effective at driving assembly of exogenous proteins, even when protein-cytoplasm quinary structure and sticking have been modified in a non-native cytoplasm. A simple Monte Carlo model of in vitro and in-cell interactions, treating BtubA and B as sticky dipoles in a matrix of sticky or nonsticky crowders, rationalizes all the experimental trends with two adjustable parameters and reveals nucleation as the likely mechanism for the time-scale separation between dimer- and tubule formation in-cell and in vitro.